What action should a licensee take if they have not previously known a person who appears vulnerable to undue influence?

The rationale behind choosing not to solicit the individual is rooted in ethical standards and the duty of care owed to clients in the chiropractic profession. Engaging with a person who appears vulnerable to undue influence without any prior relationship can pose significant risks. Vulnerable individuals may not be in a position to make fully informed decisions about their care, which could lead to exploitation or harm.

By refraining from solicitation, practitioners uphold ethical principles, specifically the importance of establishing trust and ensuring that potential patients are in a sound state to make decisions regarding their health. This aligns with the responsibility healthcare providers have to prioritize patient welfare and avoid situations where they might take advantage of someone’s vulnerability.

Opting for alternatives like referral to another licensed practitioner can be a responsible step, but direct solicitation in such a context is typically discouraged, as it may not reflect the integrity required in the profession.